Pew Funds Genetics and Public Policy Center's New Consumer Genetics Project
The Pew Charitable Trust has awarded $750,000 to the Genetics and Public Policy Center for a new project focused on consumer protections for applications of genetic testing.
To date, more than one million babies have been born worldwide as a result of IVF and in 2003 U.S fertility clinics reported 112,872 IVF cycles. Although there has been considerable medical literature exploring the possible health effects of in vitro fertilization to babies born from this technology, the potential health risks to the women who undergo this process have been less extensively studied.
Much of the discussion to date about ovulation induction drugs and cancer addresses the risks associated with the use of one drug in particular, clomiphene citrate. Clomiphene is used for ovulation induction among women who have stopped ovulating or those undergoing artificial insemination but which is not commonly used for oocyte donation or IVF. Some, but not all studies have identified a positive association between clomiphene and malignancies, both gynecologic and non-gynecologic. (Rossing et al., 1994; Whittemore et al., 1994). Concerns about clomiphene often have carried over to a similar concern about gonadoptropins, a separate set of drugs used to induce controlled ovarian hyperstimulation.
In 2005, a systematic review of nearly 100 studies examined the incidence of breast, ovarian, endometrial, melanoma, and other malignancies. (Brinton et al., 2005). In general, that review concluded that while some studies had shown a link between ovarian stimulation drugs (both those used to induce ovulation and those used to stimulate the ovaries for IVF purposes) and cancer risk, many of these studies had significant shortcomings. Two later studies similarly concluded that there is no clear evidence that infertility treatment causes cancer but that additional data are needed to thoroughly investigate this issue. (Salahab et al., 2005; Mohdavi et al., 2006)
Ovarian Cancer
The data concerning the link between infertility treatment and ovarian cancer are limited by several factors. First, sample groups in the studies have been small. Second, there has not been long-term follow-up with patients. Third, many of these investigations have been conducted as cohort studies, which are not considered as reliable as randomized controlled trials. (Gordis, 2004).
Brinton et al. (2005) concluded from a systematic review of multiple studies that there “is no conclusive link between fertility drug use and ovarian cancer.” A few trends did exist among the studies. First, ovarian cancer occurred predominantly among nulliparous women (women who have borne no children). However, this group already is at an increased baseline risk of malignancies because of their reproductive histories. Second, some studies found an increase in borderline ovarian tumors among women who underwent IVF. However, it has been proposed that the gonadotropins used might have induced the growth of already existing borderline tumors and that these women, because of their increased awareness of health issues, are more likely to be diagnosed at an earlier stage.
Breast Cancer
Studies addressing the risk of breast cancer from infertility treatment are somewhat conflicting. Some studies suggest an increased breast cancer risk while others do not. For instance, a study by Burkman noted that, in general, infertility drug use is not associated with an increased risk of breast cancer. However, those women who used a specific hormone, Human Menopausal gonadotropin (hMG), for at least six treatment cycles or months had a two to three-fold increased risk of breast cancer (Burkman et al, 2003). However, the investigators make note that these data should be approached with caution, given the number of limiting and confounding elements to the study. In another investigation, Brinton and collegues concluded that the data about the risk of breast cancer following infertility treatment are inconsistent. It is particularly difficult to tease out the effects of gonadotropins on breast cancer risk. Breast cancer is a malignancy often directly related to the hormonal environment of the women, an environment that can be temporarily increased by gonadotropin administration. In addition, many of the studies on this topic relied on thepatient to report her fertility drug dosage and duration many years after the initial treatment for infertility, raising questions about accuracy and utility of the data. Finally, as is the case with ovarian cancer, any increased incidence of breast cancer may be linked with the effects of fertility agents on an existing tumor that may be detected earlier because of the patient’s increased awareness of and attention to her health.
Endometrial Cancer
The data regarding endometrial cancer is not as robust as that for breast and ovarian cancer. In addition, the majority of research in this area pertains to the use of clomiphene and the risk of cancer. Though there is evidence that there is a twofold increase in relative risk of endometrial cancer among clomiphene users, this same trend was not noted among IVF patients (Althuis et al., 2005a). There have been very few studies that have looked directly at the effect of IVFspecific agents. Most cohort studies have not identified an increase risk of endometrial cancer specifically with IVF agents. However, some of the studies that have identified an increased risk of endometrial cancer interpret this more as a function of long-term unopposed estrogen exposure, a hormonal state associated with infertility and endometrial cancer, than the use of fertility drugs alone. At the same time, the investigators comment that more definitive evidence is required before dismissing this potential association (Modan et al., 1998).
Almeida O, Waterreus A, Spry N, et al. One year follow-up study of the association between chemical castration, sex hormones, beta-amyloid, memory and depression in men. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2004;29:1071-81.
Althuis M, Moghissi K, Westhoff C, et al. Uterine cancer after the use of clomiphene citrate to induce ovulation. American Journal of Epidemiology. 2005;161:607-15.(a)
Althuis M, Scoccia B, Lamb E et al. Melanoma, thyroid, cervical and colon cancer risk after use of fertility drugs. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2005;193:668-74.(b)
Ayhan A, Salman M, elik H, et al. Association between fertility drugs and gynecologic cancers, breast cancer, and childhood cancer. Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica. 2004;83:1104-11.
Baron J, Weiderpass E, Newcomb P, et al. Metabolic disorders and breast cancer risk. Cancer Causes Contol. 2001;12:875-80.
Brinton L, Moghissi K, Scoccia B, Westhoff C, Lamb E. Ovulation induction and cancer risk. Fertility and Sterility. 2005;83:261-74.
Brinton L, Lamb E, Moghissi K et al. Ovarian cancer risk associated with varying causes of infertility. Fertility and Sterility. 2004;82:405-14.
Burkman RT, Tang MC, Malone KE, et al. Infertilty drugs and the risk of breast cancer: findings from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Women’s Contraceptive and Reproductive Experiences Study. Fertility and Sterility. 2003;79:844-51.
Daelmans C, Smits G, de Maertelaer V et al. Prediction of severity of symptoms in iatrogenic ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome by follicle-stimulating hormone receptor Ser680Asn polymorphism. Journal of Clinical Metabolism. 2004;90:6310-5.
Dahlgren E, Friberg L, Johanson S, et al. Endometrial carcinoma; ovarian dysfunction-a risk factor in young women. European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology 1991;41:143-50.
deBoer E, Tonkwlaar I, Burger C, et al. Are cause of subfertility and in vitro fertilization treatment risk factors for an earlier start of menopause? Menopause: The Journal of the North American Menopause Society. 2005;12:578-88.
Escobedo L, Lee N, Peterson H, et al. Infertility associated endometrial cancer risk may be limited to specific subgroups of infertile women. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1991;77:124-8.
Greb R, Behre H, Simoni M. Pharmacogenetics in ovarian stimulation. Reproductive Biomedicine Online. 2005;11:589-600.
Gordis L. Epidemiology5th edition. Philadephia: Saunders, 2004.
Jordan C, Belar C, Williams R. Anonymous oocyte donation: a follow-up analysis of donors’ experiences. Journal of Psychomotor Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2004;25:145-151.
Klip H, van Leeuwen F, Schats R, et al. Risk of benign gynaecological diseases and hormonal disorders according to responsiveness to ovarian stimulation in IVF: a follow-up study of 8714 women. Human Reproduction. 2003;18:1951-58.
Lazar K. Wonder drug for men alleged to cause harm in women. Boston Herald. Part 1. August 22, 1999, Part 2 August 23, 1999, and Part 3 August 24, 1999.
Mahdavi A, Pejovic T, and Nezhat F. Induction of ovulation and ovarian cancer: a critical review of the literature. Fertility and Sterility. 2006;85:819-26.
Modan B, Ron E, Lerner-Geva, et al. Cancer incidence in a cohort of infertile women. American Journal of Epidemiology. 1998;361:1810-12.
Modesitt S, Tortolero-Luna G, Robinson J, et al. Ovarian and extraovarian enometriosis-related cancer. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2002;100:788-95.
Morris, RS, Paulson RJ, Sauer MV, Lobo RA. Predictive value of serum oestradiol concentrations and oocyte number in severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Human Reproduction. 1995. 10:811-14.
Navot D, “Severe Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome”, in Textbook of Assisted Reproductive Techniques: Laboratory and Clinical Perspectives eds. Gardner D, Weissman A, Howles C, Shoham Z. Martin Dunitz, Ltd.: London, 2001.
Ness R. Endometriosis and ovarian cancer: Thoughts on shared pathophysiology. American J. of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2003;189:280-94.
Norsigian J. Hearing on human cloning and embryonic stem cell research after Seoul: Examining exploitation, fraud, and ethical problems in the research. Presented to the Subcommittee on Criminal Justice, Drug Policy, and Human Resources, March 7, 2006.
Orvieto R. Can we eliminate severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome? Human Reproduction. 2004;20:320-22.
Pierpoint T, McKeigue P, Issacs A, et al. Mortality of women with polycycstic ovary syndrome at longterm follow-up. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 1998;51:581-6.
Rossing M, Daling J, Weiss N et al. Ovarian tumors in a cohort of infertile women. New England Journal of Medicine. 1994;331:771-6.
Salhab M, Sarakbi A, Mokbel K. In vitro fertilization and breast cancer risk: a review. International Journal of Women’s Medicine. 2005;50:259-66.
Sauer M, Paulson R, Lobo R. Rare occurrence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in oocyte donors. International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1996;52:259-62.
Sauer M. Egg donor solicitation: Problems exist, but do abuses? American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2001;1:1-2.
Stern R, Dash R, Bentley R. Malignancy in endometriosis: frequency and comparison of ovarian and extraovarian types. International Journal of Gynecologic Pathology. 1997;176:572-79.
Tanka T, Niimi H, Matsou N, et al. Results of long-term follow-up after treatment of central precocious puberty with leuprorelin acetate: Evaluation of effectiveness of treatment and recovery of gonadal function. The TAP-144-SR Japanese study group on central precocious puberty. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2005;90:1371-76.
Venn A, Watson L, Bruinsma F, et al. Risk of cancer after the use of fertility drugs with in-vitro fertilization. The Lancet. 1999;354:1586-90.
Whittemore AS. The risk of ovarian cancer after treatment for infertility. New England Journal of Medicine. 1994;331:805-06.
The Pew Charitable Trust has awarded $750,000 to the Genetics and Public Policy Center for a new project focused on consumer protections for applications of genetic testing.
The Genetics and Public Policy Center’s Public Consultation Project on Genes, Environment, and Health consisted of focus groups, interviews with community leaders, a survey, and a series of town halls. This report summarizes the five town hall sessions, which took place from March-May 2008 in Jackson, Mississippi; Kansas City, Missouri; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Phoenix, Arizona; and Portland, Oregon.
Four in five Americans support the idea of a nationwide study to investigate the interactions of genes, environment and lifestyle, and three in five say they would be willing to take part in such a study, according to a survey released today.
More infoPresident Bush today signed into law the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 (GINA), providing vital protection for Americans against the misuse of genetic test results by heath insurers and employers.
No mechanism currently exists to ensure that genetic tests are supported by adequate evidence before they go to market, or that marketing claims are truthful and not misleading, according to a policy analysis to be published April 4 in Science. Misleading claims about genetic tests may lead health-care providers and patients to make inappropriate decisions about which tests to take and how to use genetic tests that have potential for profound medical consequences, the authors argue.