Pew Funds Genetics and Public Policy Center's New Consumer Genetics Project
The Pew Charitable Trust has awarded $750,000 to the Genetics and Public Policy Center for a new project focused on consumer protections for applications of genetic testing.
Since the inception of the Human Genome Project in 1990, genetic testing has become an increasingly integral component in the diagnosis, treatment, management, and prevention of numerous diseases and conditions. Today, the number of genetic tests available is rising dramatically, with new tests entering the healthcare market every day. Information gained from genetic test results has a significant impact on medical decision-making.
A review of the comments submitted in response to the NOI reveals that there was substantial support for the creation of a genetic testing specialty under CLIA in order to address the unique issues and complexities raised by genetic tests. Combining the support of the laboratories with the fact that a majority of the American public supports government regulation to ensure the safety and accuracy of genetic test results25 only underscores the urgent need to revisit the issue of regulating genetic testing. Five years after the NOI was published, a genetic specialty has still not been created under CLIA. To of the comments to the NOI indicate that the creation of a genetic testing specialty is achievable if the requirements focus on the key components needed to ensure quality. Key components include criteria for establishing analytic and clinical validity and requirements for proficiency testing. The more contentious issues, such as additional requirements for consent, confidentiality, and genetic counseling, should be set aside for the moment in the interest of ensuring that genetic tests are safe and accurate and provide information relevant to health care decision making. These additional requirements arguably would be beyond the appropriate role of clinical diagnostic laboratories and may well be better addressed through other means. When the responses are stripped of these issues, the comments suggest that any regulation must (1) clearly define “genetic testing” and include three subcategories: molecular, cytogenetic, and biochemical testing; (2) specify the tests exempt from the new CLIA regulations; (3) clearly outline if and when a test is considered “genetic”; and (4) provide clear guidance regarding the definition of clinical validity and the scope of the laboratory director’s duty to document it.
Federal regulation of genetic testing is widely supported and desperately needed to ensure the safety, accuracy, and reliability of genetic tests. Although many members of the public believe that the government already regulates the accuracy and reliability of genetic tests and, moreover, support this oversight role, there are serious gaps in the government’s oversight of genetic testing. Adequate oversight of the laboratories performing genetic tests is a key component of ensuring quality. Such oversight requires that the government take immediate steps to implement the long-promised regulations to establish a genetic testing specialty and thereby provide greater assurance that laboratories are providing accurate and reliable genetic tests to consumers.
The Pew Charitable Trust has awarded $750,000 to the Genetics and Public Policy Center for a new project focused on consumer protections for applications of genetic testing.
The Genetics and Public Policy Center’s Public Consultation Project on Genes, Environment, and Health consisted of focus groups, interviews with community leaders, a survey, and a series of town halls. This report summarizes the five town hall sessions, which took place from March-May 2008 in Jackson, Mississippi; Kansas City, Missouri; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Phoenix, Arizona; and Portland, Oregon.
Four in five Americans support the idea of a nationwide study to investigate the interactions of genes, environment and lifestyle, and three in five say they would be willing to take part in such a study, according to a survey released today.
More infoPresident Bush today signed into law the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 (GINA), providing vital protection for Americans against the misuse of genetic test results by heath insurers and employers.
No mechanism currently exists to ensure that genetic tests are supported by adequate evidence before they go to market, or that marketing claims are truthful and not misleading, according to a policy analysis to be published April 4 in Science. Misleading claims about genetic tests may lead health-care providers and patients to make inappropriate decisions about which tests to take and how to use genetic tests that have potential for profound medical consequences, the authors argue.