''Health Impact Assessments Take on Broader Role in Cities and States''
Aaron Wernham, director of the Health Impact Project discusses the benefits of health impact assessments in this edition of Governing.
More info"In December, the Department of Health and Human Services released “Healthy People 2020” — a 10-year blueprint aimed at improving the health of the nation. The plan comes amidst rising rates of many diseases – such as asthma and diabetes — and skyrocketing health care costs.
Now at the dawn of 2011, federal, state and local officials are faced with the tough job of turning the public health goals outlined by that plan into reality.
However, they will almost certainly fail at that increasingly urgent task unless they start factoring health into proposals being considered in non-health sectors like energy, housing, agriculture and transportation.
What does a decision to build a new highway have to do with health?
Plenty, as it turns out.
Depending on how it is planned, a new highway may change levels of air pollutants and the risk of asthma for people living nearby. New traffic patterns may also increase the risk of traffic-related injuries. Furthermore, the roadway might unintentionally cut off an important walking route to and from a transit stop or local school, making it harder for adults and children to get enough exercise.
These are significant health concerns. According to the American Public Health Association, it is estimated that health problems associated with our current transportation system—such as injuries, asthma, cardiovascular disease and premature mortality—may result in over $300 billion in additional costs every year. This amount includes accident and medical expenses, and lost wages and lost productivity.
Yet officials in transportation and other sectors like energy, agriculture or housing do not routinely identify and address the health implications of their decisions.
One way to address this shortcoming is a powerful approach called a health impact assessment (HIA), which is being used worldwide to identify unintended health risks and unnecessary costs. At the same time, HIAs build in solutions aimed at keeping people healthy.
For example, collaboration between city planners and health officials on an HIA for a proposed housing development in Colorado has led to new measures that will minimize the impact of pollution from local roadways and offer residents greater opportunities for exercise, all with a minimum investment of time and expense.
In New Hampshire, an HIA is being used to inform the difficult choices that the state legislature will need to face in cutting costs to deal with the budget deficit. For example, how will changes in Medicaid reimbursement levels affect delivery of medical services in the hospital? Or, will decreases in the amount of state tax revenue that is shared with municipalities change welfare program offerings at the local level and will that have unintended consequences for health?
In Atlanta, the regional transportation agency is collaborating with experts from the Georgia Institute of Technology’s College of Architecture to plan updates to the region’s roads, highways and urban centers that will maximize the return on investment for health. The aim is to minimize air pollution and the risk of injury, create safe places to exercise, and provide better access to services such as clinics and grocery stores, as well as help to relieve congested roadways.
As a doctor, I have seen firsthand the impact that the places we live, work and play can have on our health. I have cared for many diabetics who struggle to follow exercise recommendations because there is no gym nearby and nowhere safe to walk; asthmatics who live in housing with mold and substandard ventilation; and children who live in neighborhoods that have fast food outlets on every corner, but no grocery stores that sell healthy foods for miles in any direction.
In America today, one out of three people struggle with excess weight or obesity. Type 2 diabetes, a deadly disease once seen only in adults, is now attacking our children. Meanwhile, an astonishing one out of four working-age adults suffers from a chronic condition like heart disease or asthma. Many of these diseases are preventable, yet they are increasing at an alarming rate and exacting an enormous cost on our nation.
We cannot afford to delay. Along with many diseases, health-related costs in the United States are growing every year. In order to stem the rising tide of disease and get the best return on our investments in health, we must proactively identify opportunities to prevent illness and fight the spread of chronic diseases in our country.
Many of the Healthy People 2020 objectives will require actions on the part of officials in education, agriculture, transportation, energy and many other areas. An HIA is a practical, effective tool to address that need and factor health into the decision-making process."
Aaron Wernham, director of the Health Impact Project discusses the benefits of health impact assessments in this edition of Governing.
More infoThe Health Impact Project announced eight new grant recipients that will receive funding to conduct health impact assessments, or HIAs. The projects will bring health considerations into upcoming decisions on topics including education, sanitation infrastructure, and energy. The grantees were selected based on their response to a national call for proposals.
More infoThe city of Greenville, South Carolina recently completed a yearlong health impact assessment with support from Pew's Health Impact Project.
More infoThe Health Impact Project announces a request for proposals (RFP) that will fund three grants of up to $100,000 each to identify and address potential health impacts of an upcoming decision in each of their communities or state through the use of health impact assessments (HIA).
More infoThe New York Times interviews Aaron Wernham, project director for the Health Impact Project, about the growing field of health impact assessments.
More infoMinnesota organizations are invited to participate in an in-person training to learn about health impact assessments (HIAs). An HIA can help improve the well-being of local communities by incorporating health into decisions in other sectors.
More info"A new report from the Pew Charitable Trusts and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation concludes that getting rid of junk food at school boosts kids’ health and doesn’t hurt schools financially. Even many snack food companies are on board."
More info"'The evidence is clear and compelling,' said Jessica Donze Black, director of the Kids’ Safe & Healthful Foods Project in a press release. 'Implementing strong national nutrition standards to make the snacks and beverages our children consume healthier is something that schools and districts can afford. The USDA should do all it can to finalize and help implement strong standards.'"
More infoAaron Wernham, director of the Health Impact Project, explains how by systematically assessing the health risks of development decisions upfront, health impact assessments can prevent costly and harmful mistakes.
More info"A study released late last month delivers the message: Make competitive foods offered in schools healthier, too. The study was a collaboration between the Pew Charitable Trusts and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and came from two projects, the Kids’ Safe and Healthful Foods Project – the director, Jessica Donze Black, is a University of Delaware graduate – and the Health Impact Project."
More infoThe Health Impact Project, a collaboration of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and The Pew Charitable Trusts, announced a call for proposals for grants to conduct health impact assessments (HIAs). HIAs identify and address the health impacts of decisions in other sectors, such as planning roads, passing agriculture legislation, or siting schools.
More infoPew and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation collaborate to examine impact of updated USDA standards for snack and a la carte foods and beverages sold in schools.
More info"A recent study has reaffirmed what local school officials already knew: Student health and school budgets can both benefit from higher nutrition standards."
More info